annoying picture books

I\’ve been reading with interest some of the posts lately on other blogs about \”bad books\”. Are there really books that can be said to be awful? Doesn\’t every book have a merit somwhere, if it has an appreciative reader? I\’m not sure. I know there\’s a lot of books that simply don\’t appeal to me personally, but no matter what the reason I don\’t like them, there\’s bound to be other readers who do. On the other hand, books that have grammatical errors and other flaws seem to me they could have used a stronger editing hand. If the story is poor as well, I sometimes wonder why they ever got published.

So it struck me as kind of funny that on our latest trip to the public library, we picked up two books that disappointed me. They\’re both children\’s books, which I don\’t usually mention here, but they got me thinking so I\’m going to write about them.

The first is a step-into-reading book with a Barbie theme. Now, I rarely ever censor my daughter\’s reading choices. Whatever she chooses at the library that she wants to read, I\’ll read it to her, even if I think it\’s silly. But the kid books based on cartoon episodes and movies can really annoy me. Usually the story is chopped up so much to fit into a book format that it makes an unsatisfying story. Barbie in A Mermaid Tale is based on a full-length animated movie (which I haven\’t seen). It\’s a book aimed at beginning readers, so the sentences are very short and simple. It begins like this (each line here is one page of text):

Merliah loves to surf. She is the best surfer in Malibu.

Merliah\’s hair turns pink! She dives into the water. She can breathe!

Merliah meets Zuma. Zuma is a dolphin. Zuma talks!

Zuma tells Merliah about her past. Merliah is half mermaid!

So… the story goes on to reveal that Merliah\’s mother, the rightful queen, has been imprisoned and her wicked aunt Eris taken over the undersea kingdom. Merliah gets a fake tail to swim, the help of some animal and mermaid friends, and goes on a quest to save her mother. She has to do three three things: find a magic comb and a special fish (dreamfish), and get the necklace her aunt wears. Here is where the story starts disintegrating. I\’m assuming the comb and dreamfish are to help Merliah finish her quest and confront Eris, but there\’s no explanation of how they do that. After finding the dreamfish and getting his promise of help, the rest of the story reads like this:

Merliah has a plan. She grabs the necklace! Eris is angry.

Eris traps Merliah in a whirlpool.

Merliah accepts that she is a mermaid. She gets a real mermaid tail!

Merliah escapes! Eris is trapped in the whirlpool instead. Oceana is saved!

Then Merliah meets her mother, and there\’s a happy ending.

Uh… what happened here? The pictures give a little more information, but not much. It looks like Merliah is dancing to distract Eris, but then she just swims up and snatches the necklace? that\’s a plan? how did the dreamfish help? And the statement about accepting she\’s a mermaid seemed out of the blue. I\’m guessing that\’s what enabled her to escape from the whirlpool, but again, no explanation. Both my daughter and I were left kind of scratching our heads at the end. She had a bunch of questions, and I just had to shrug. I don\’t know the story in its full context. Silly perhaps to get annoyed over a little kid\’s book like this, but why can\’t they make it just a bit more complete? Only two more pages would have fleshed out the story a bit more. I know the plug is to get kids interested in reading by publishing books on themes and characters they\’re already fans of, but do they have to make it inane?

Needless to say, my daughter likes the book anyway because it has mermaids, and the pictures are all very pretty, pink and sparkly. She doesn\’t care that the story has holes.

The other book was one I chose, because I loved the illustrations by Beverly Doyle. They\’re wonderful, lively, textured paintings depicting the environment of the ocean and shore, the waves, sky and creatures all rendered with beautiful attention. I was even more intrigued when I learned they were created with a medium I\’m not very familiar with, airbrush. I thought at first they were watercolor or acrylic paintings!

The text of What the Sea Saw by Stephanie St. Pierre, starts out like this:

What the sea saw was sky above. / What the sky saw was sea below… / The sky saw soft, white-feathered wings dip into the foaming sea. / The gull saw fish in the sea swimming in schools, scales shimmering silver. / The fish saw light on the waves weaving into the deep.

Here the book abruptly changes tone. Instead of continuing the thread of what-something-saw (which I was rather enjoying) it becomes prose describing things:

Sandpipers ran across the wet sand leaving a trail of three-pronged footprints. / The gull screeched and flew through the heavy sky.

Then shows the events of an approaching storm and rainfall. Still very lovely, but I was thrown off at the change of rhythm. Then it goes back into the sea saw/ the sky saw thread, until the book closes with nightfall. I was puzzled again. I wanted to love this book. The illustrations are wonderful, and both the what-something-saw thread and the description of how seashore creatures experience the rainstorm are nice. But they don\’t seem to fit together. I would have enjoyed a book that just described the animals and events of the day on the seashore, or a book that linked everything together by showing what each animal saw. But put together it makes a jump in the middle that made me like it less.

So, this is a case of me not liking one book because I thought it was poorly written, and the other because it didn\’t quite meet my expectations. Maybe I\’m being really picky, about not liking these kid books. If I had to give them ratings, I\’d give the barbie book a 1, and the seashore book a 2. For a balance of opinion, do read about What the Sea Saw on Wild Rose Reader.

11 Responses

  1. Yeah- there were some kids books that just annoyed me to death but my daughter loved. Kids just have different standards and really I like something pink and sparkly occasionally too – even though Fancy Nancy is more my style.

  2. I find a lot of children's books annoying too, but as long as the children are enjoying them then I don't mind. This looks like another case to support my no bad book theory – just the wrong person for the specific one ;-)I hope you find some books that you and your daughter enjoy soon!

  3. Oh yeah, those movie to early reader books can be HORRIBLE! My daughter was so into Barbie when she was younger, so we had them all. Makes you want to write a kids' book, doesn't it?

  4. Carolsnotebook- I try and keep the same perspective: if she likes it, that's good enough for me!Farmlanebooks- Oh, we have found plenty to enjoy. In the stack of a half-dozen brought home, these were the only two duds (and only in my opinion, she liked them regardless). I think I, myself, am just not the proper audience for children's books anymore!Sandy- Mine's only slightly into barbie, thank goodness. She has a few barbie dolls with outfits but is unaware there are films and cartoons out there (which I am fine with, really!)

  5. I'm not a big fan of commercialized kids books like the Barbie books … though I get why they make them and I'm guilty of getting them for my son. But it still kills me a little inside.The other books sounds very inconsistent for reasons that don't seem clear. Now that I would have a bigger problem with as it seemed like it didn't have to be that way … I would hold it to a higher level.And you're not alone in feeling like this. I read the \”classic\” Love Your Forever by Robert Munsch and found it horrifying. I wrote a post about it if you are interested … it turned out that it is quite a divisive book!Here is the link:http://www.findyournextbookhere.com/2010/02/reading-with-little-one-love-you.html

  6. The kids I used to babysit for sometimes LOVED books that I thought were very inane. But I try not to be too judgey, because I learned to read from one of those little audiobook versions of the Disney Lady and the Tramp. I read it so often it fell apart.

  7. Jenners- I didn't care much for Love You Forever, myself! I just thought it was corny. Not charming, or touching, corny. The ocean book puzzled me- it was so lovely at first, and then the flow broke up. I didn't understand why that happened.Jenny- You know, I had a little Disney read-along book I read to pieces when I was small, too- I think it was Fox and the Hound. I try hard not to judge, and let her read what she wants. Sometimes I fear letting her read stuff that has bad grammar or glaring story holes will wedge those errors into her mind as the correct way, but then I figure it's going over her head at this point, she doesn't even notice and just loves the story and pictures!

  8. I think what's so horrible about the first book is the writing! Now I can understand if it's one of those read-it-yourself books, but how is this teaching kids? I guess to speak without transition, say three sentences where only one is required, and make everything as simplistic as possible. For example, couldn't the author have said, \”Merliah meets Zuma who is a talking dolphin\”? Of course, maybe it is a first book reader? I don't have young ones so I don't know how that works yet.

  9. Trish- my thoughts exactly. It is intended to be the first book a child tries to read on their own, thus the simplicity. But I think they made it too simple. It still should make sense, and sound smooth!

  10. That Barbie book would have driven me crazy too. I also can't stand it when characters in the early reader books have Names that are hard for little kids to figure out (like Merliah).

  11. Alyce- Actually, Merliah is just the kind of name my five-year-old would invent for a mermaid character, so she had no problem with it. I can see it being confusing for younger kids, though. And I've come across some I couldn't even pronounce before!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

DISCLAIMER:

All books reviewed on this site are owned by me, or borrowed from the public library. Exceptions are a very occasional review copy sent to me by a publisher or author, as noted. Receiving a book does not influence my opinion or evaluation of it

SUBSCRIBE VIA EMAIL:

Subscribe to my blog:

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

VIEW MY PERSONAL COLLECTION:

TRADE BOOKS WITH ME ON:

ARCHIVES: 

2024
January 2024 (21)February 2024 (22)March 2024 (45)April 2024 (38)May 2024 (17)
2023
January 2023 (27)February 2023 (23)March 2023 (25)April 2023 (11)May 2023 (17)June 2023 (11)July 2023 (23)August 2023 (23)September 2023 (14)October 2023 (14)November 2023 (26)December 2023 (14)
2022
January 2022 (12)February 2022 (7)March 2022 (13)April 2022 (16)May 2022 (13)June 2022 (21)July 2022 (15)August 2022 (27)September 2022 (10)October 2022 (17)November 2022 (16)December 2022 (23)
2021
January 2021 (14)February 2021 (13)March 2021 (14)April 2021 (7)May 2021 (10)June 2021 (5)July 2021 (10)August 2021 (27)September 2021 (16)October 2021 (11)November 2021 (14)December 2021 (12)
2020
January 2020 (14)February 2020 (6)March 2020 (10)April 2020 (1)May 2020 (10)June 2020 (15)July 2020 (13)August 2020 (26)September 2020 (10)October 2020 (9)November 2020 (16)December 2020 (22)
2019
January 2019 (12)February 2019 (9)March 2019 (5)April 2019 (10)May 2019 (9)June 2019 (6)July 2019 (18)August 2019 (13)September 2019 (13)October 2019 (7)November 2019 (5)December 2019 (18)
2018
January 2018 (17)February 2018 (18)March 2018 (9)April 2018 (9)May 2018 (6)June 2018 (21)July 2018 (12)August 2018 (7)September 2018 (13)October 2018 (15)November 2018 (10)December 2018 (13)
2017
January 2017 (19)February 2017 (12)March 2017 (7)April 2017 (4)May 2017 (5)June 2017 (8)July 2017 (13)August 2017 (17)September 2017 (12)October 2017 (15)November 2017 (14)December 2017 (11)
2016
January 2016 (5)February 2016 (14)March 2016 (5)April 2016 (6)May 2016 (14)June 2016 (12)July 2016 (11)August 2016 (11)September 2016 (11)October 2016 (9)November 2016 (1)December 2016 (3)
2015
January 2015 (9)February 2015 (9)March 2015 (11)April 2015 (10)May 2015 (10)June 2015 (2)July 2015 (12)August 2015 (13)September 2015 (16)October 2015 (13)November 2015 (10)December 2015 (14)
2014
January 2014 (14)February 2014 (11)March 2014 (5)April 2014 (15)May 2014 (12)June 2014 (17)July 2014 (22)August 2014 (19)September 2014 (10)October 2014 (19)November 2014 (14)December 2014 (14)
2013
January 2013 (25)February 2013 (28)March 2013 (18)April 2013 (21)May 2013 (12)June 2013 (7)July 2013 (13)August 2013 (25)September 2013 (24)October 2013 (17)November 2013 (18)December 2013 (20)
2012
January 2012 (21)February 2012 (19)March 2012 (9)April 2012 (23)May 2012 (31)June 2012 (21)July 2012 (19)August 2012 (16)September 2012 (4)October 2012 (2)November 2012 (7)December 2012 (19)
2011
January 2011 (26)February 2011 (22)March 2011 (18)April 2011 (11)May 2011 (6)June 2011 (7)July 2011 (10)August 2011 (9)September 2011 (14)October 2011 (13)November 2011 (15)December 2011 (22)
2010
January 2010 (27)February 2010 (19)March 2010 (20)April 2010 (24)May 2010 (22)June 2010 (24)July 2010 (31)August 2010 (17)September 2010 (18)October 2010 (11)November 2010 (13)December 2010 (19)
2009
January 2009 (23)February 2009 (26)March 2009 (32)April 2009 (22)May 2009 (18)June 2009 (26)July 2009 (34)August 2009 (31)September 2009 (30)October 2009 (23)November 2009 (26)December 2009 (18)
2008
January 2008 (35)February 2008 (26)March 2008 (33)April 2008 (15)May 2008 (29)June 2008 (29)July 2008 (29)August 2008 (34)September 2008 (29)October 2008 (27)November 2008 (27)December 2008 (24)
2007
August 2007 (12)September 2007 (28)October 2007 (27)November 2007 (28)December 2007 (14)
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950